• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

David Bressler

B2B Go-to-Market Storytelling

  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Subscribe
  • Buy my Book

What is a (Crypto) Wallet?

December 24, 2018

The cryp­to space is com­plex. Words often get thrown about with­out deep thought about what they mean. Wal­lets are a fas­ci­nat­ing and impor­tant aspect for the future of cryp­to, but I don’t think many out­side the cryp­to space real­ize why.

I’d like to put my thoughts down. Part­ly to clar­i­fy my think­ing, part­ly to edu­cate, and (impor­tant­ly) part­ly to get these thoughts out there so that in the future I can see if I’m right or not.

Before I con­tin­ue, I have a favor to ask. I’m not sure if every­thing I write below is cor­rect. Or, if it’s as impor­tant as I think it is. If you have an opin­ion (pro or con) I’d love if you share it (con­struc­tive­ly / polite­ly) in the com­ments at the end of the post.

In par­tic­u­lar, if I give an exam­ple, and the exam­ple is wrong (or incom­plete) but the point I’m try­ing to make is still valid, please try to keep the big­ger pic­ture in mind, as that’s my intent with this post — to put a stake in the ground on the big pic­ture, even if the details get fuzzy (or if there are dif­fer­ent avenues to the same out­come). Keep in mind, part of the chal­lenge with cryp­to is the com­plex­i­ty. It’s not hard to trans­fer or secure cryp­to… but it sure is com­plex. Prob­lems of com­plex­i­ty are still real-prob­lems… they’re not “the user is too stu­pid” prob­lems. </end mini-rant>

I’d love it even more if you shared this post so that I can get the most feed­back pos­si­ble. I’ve seen a lot of bitcoin/blockchain explain­ers… but noth­ing about wal­lets in plain Eng­lish.

Always find a metaphor

Ear­ly in my career I worked at Teknekron Soft­ware Sys­tems (TSS), the com­pa­ny that pre­ced­ed TIBCO. TSS was found­ed in the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try, and it’s claim to fame was The Infor­ma­tion Bus (TIB).

As leg­end has it, the founder noticed that traders had all these fan­cy screens on their desks and then used paper or spread­sheets to man­u­al­ly copy data between sys­tems to make deci­sions. The data was used to trade, or run their busi­ness. The TIB was cre­at­ed to con­sol­i­date the data from these sys­tems and present them how­ev­er the trad­er wished. There were three key ele­ments of TIB mes­sag­ing:

  1. Pub­lish / Sub­scribe (so you could get the infor­ma­tion you were inter­est­ed in broad­cast to you with­out hav­ing to keep ask­ing)
  2. Sub­ject-Based Address­ing (so you could sub­scribe to IBM’s stock price, or IBM’s stock price from NYSE… with­out hav­ing to wor­ry where the data came from)
  3. Self-Describ­ing Data (so you did­n’t have to have any a pri­ori knowl­edge about the data / data-struc­ture, the data itself would tell you what it was)

Because TIBCO went on to con­quer many more indus­tries using the TIB ‘mid­dl­ware’ an impor­tant piece of Teknekro­n’s suc­cess is most­ly for­got­ten.

There was one more prod­uct that cat­a­pult­ed TSS to suc­cess. Let’s face it, mid­dle­ware isn’t that sexy, and peo­ple only notice it when it’s not work­ing. What they do notice, is the screen they look at all day. The piece that every­one looked at, that drove tons of con­sult­ing and busi­ness trans­for­ma­tion, the piece that man­i­fest­ed all the val­ue of the TIB was called Mar­ket­Sheet.

Mar­ket­Sheet had ‘wid­gets’ to dis­play any of the var­i­ous data types traders would sub­scribe to from the TIB. You could wire these wid­gets togeth­er quite sim­ply to do all the cal­cu­la­tions that were for­mer­ly done in spread­sheets or on paper. It became a real-time dis­play to the busi­ness, that turned trad­ing floors into event-dri­ven trad­ing machines.

Let me sum­ma­rize:

  1. You could sub­scribe to data,
  2. The data itself would tell you what it was, and
  3. You could view and manip­u­late the data in this all-pur­pose uni­fied dis­play.

It should be obvi­ous, but it’s worth point­ing out, that any busi­ness might sub­scribe to a vari­ety of data sources that they believe is valu­able to their busi­ness… it’s those data sources that they con­sol­i­dat­ed over the TIB and manip­u­lat­ed in Mar­ket­Sheet. Two dif­fer­ent but sim­i­lar busi­ness­es might sub­scribe to dif­fer­ent sets of data.

Crypto Wallets

Mar­ket­Sheet, in my opin­ion, is a metaphor for cryp­to wal­lets. Except that instead of self-describ­ing data (that informs the busi­ness) in the cryp­to space, we’re deal­ing with con­tracts (that defines the busi­ness).

We don’t have a self-describ­ing con­tract, but stan­dards like ERC-20 are emerg­ing that allow wal­lets to deter­mine how the con­tract devel­op­er wants a con­tract to be expressed.

Said dif­fer­ent­ly, today each token/contract requires a wal­let pur­pose-built to express the con­trac­t’s capa­bil­i­ties.

With ERC-20 (and sim­i­lar) stan­dards, a wal­let can hold many types of con­tracts in one place.

An Example

The above is still quite a bit abstract. Let me make it con­crete using two projects — Swarm Fund and Cel­sius Net­work.

Swarm Fund says they’re build­ing an open infra­struc­ture for dig­i­tal secu­ri­ties. I’m not going to explain that because I’ll give an exam­ple below that will suf­fice.

Cel­sius Net­work presents itself as the bank of the future (the ‘Unbank’). Apolo­gies if that’s not exact­ly how they think of them­selves. Again, my exam­ple below will suf­fice.

Let’s start with Swarm. Swarm enables secu­ri­ties to be dig­i­tized to the blockchain. It’s a hot area, and Swarm has been at it quite some time. One of the projects I like is a com­mer­cial real-estate fund in Puer­to Rico. The Fund intends to rede­vel­op a land­mark build­ing for the crypto/blockchain com­mu­ni­ty. Sus­pend any judg­ment about the project for the moment. You can imag­ine that you’d get vot­ing rights as part of the con­tract that defines The Fund.

How­ev­er, the expres­sion of those vot­ing rights would come about in a wal­let. I’ve vot­ed using Swarm before (but not for this fund) but it’s been a while. There was a lot of copy­ing and past­ing between my cryp­to wal­let and the Swarm web­site. It was­n’t hard but it sure was com­pli­cat­ed. I could not do it on mobile, and it cer­tain­ly was­n’t any­thing like a proxy state­ment web form that you’d expe­ri­ence at a tra­di­tion­al bro­ker (like Fideli­ty). Swarm does­n’t have a wal­let, which makes it hard­er because you are man­u­al­ly con­nect­ing oper­a­tions done on the tokens in your “vanil­la” cryp­to wal­let into the Swarm project.

My point how­ev­er real­ly is not how com­pli­cat­ed it was, but that vot­ing rights are imple­ment­ed in a Swarm silo-ed ecosys­tem some­how even though they’re expressed clear­ly in the Swarm con­tract.

Back to Cel­sius.

Sim­ply put, if you hold cer­tain cryp­to in Cel­sius you get paid inter­est. You can also bor­row against cryp­to hold­ings using your tokens as col­lat­er­al. Don’t wor­ry (for the sake of this post) how Cel­sius works.

Let’s imag­ine that Cel­sius sup­port­ed the Swarm token (it does­n’t) so that I could earn inter­est on my Swarm hold­ings and bor­row against them.

I would lose the abil­i­ty to access my vot­ing rights. Those Swarm tokens could only be in one place, and Cel­sius does­n’t sup­port Swarm vot­ing. Swar­m’s silo does­n’t sup­port earn­ing inter­est on my tokens.

Today I have to choose between the two.

In a world where I held both tokens in a sin­gle wal­let that under­stood the con­tracts, I should be able to take advan­tage of both ser­vices because they don’t con­tra­dict each oth­er. I could hold Swarm, earn inter­est, and use them to vote as long as they weren’t allo­cat­ed to one of the Swarm equi­ty projects.

Of course, maybe it’s not clear how vot­ing would work (do I own the Swarm tokens or does Cel­sius?)… so I’m not sug­gest­ing this is all clear, or that this is even the best exam­ple. In fact, as I write this, I real­ize maybe it’s not the best exam­ple, but I’m going to leave it.

The impor­tant point is that even though the tokens make up my “wealth” I am lim­it­ed by the con­tract imple­men­ta­tion as to how I can use them.

An Example Using Today’s Brokerages

Maybe a sim­pler exam­ple would help?

I own Apple stock in a tra­di­tion­al bro­ker­age. If I want­ed to trade on mar­gin (bor­row against my Apple stock) I could because my tra­di­tion­al bro­ker­age has a “con­tract” for that. What if they did­n’t? I’d have to go some­where else, there would be a lot of paper­work, and I’d prob­a­bly be able to bor­row against my hold­ings if the amount were large enough and I was an impor­tant enough cus­tomer. How­ev­er, the process would have a lot of over­head… which means it’s not acces­si­ble to lots of peo­ple.

This is sim­i­lar to the con­ver­sa­tion hap­pen­ing around accred­it­ed investors… why do accred­it­ed investors get spe­cial treatment/access? Because the whole gov­er­nance process does­n’t scale, and lim­it­ing ser­vices access to accred­it­ed investors helps scale gov­er­nance because it’s a small­er pool of peo­ple than ‘every­one.’

If I owned that Apple stock on the blockchain, I could lay­er a con­tract on top of it that allowed me to bor­row against it (and locked those col­lat­er­al shares from being sold) quite eas­i­ly (assum­ing the infra­struc­ture is in place). Com­pa­nies could com­pete for my cov­ered loan (I’m a big fan of com­pe­ti­tion). In effect, col­lat­er­al­ized loans would be unbun­dled from exist­ing full-ser­vice bank­ing offer­ings.

Inter­me­di­aries whose val­ue is the guar­ant­ed of trust between par­ties will be replaced by the blockchain, but only because the busi­ness process they guar­an­tee is expressed in a wal­let. Click To Tweet

Banks would be unbun­dled by con­tracts that express the bank’s offer­ings and are acces­si­ble via cryp­to wal­lets. Where­as the banks used to be the inter­me­di­ary that pro­vid­ed trust, now trust is built into the infra­struc­ture (imple­ment­ed in the blockchain).

The com­pe­ti­tion for peo­ple’s busi­ness will shift from trust/guarantee to the expe­ri­ence with the busi­ness process (as expressed in a wal­let).

Why is This Important?

I was lis­ten­ing to Pom­p’s Off The Chain cryp­to pod­cast with Howard Lind­zon. It was a great episode, and I rec­om­mend a lis­ten espe­cial­ly if you any inter­est at all in Fin­Tech. Howard talks about his kids a cou­ple of times and in par­tic­u­lar points out that as mil­len­ni­als they have mul­ti­ple apps for every­thing (such as pay­ments — pay­pal, ven­mo, etc — or invest­ing — robin­hood, oth­ers), and switch between them with lit­tle or no loy­al­ty.

I am a big fan of Stock­pile to invest in stocks (note, invest­ing is dif­fer­ent than trad­ing). I also use Stash, Robin­hood, Fideli­ty, UBS, Chase, Coin­base, and oth­ers.

Imag­ine if each of these finan­cial busi­ness­es was bro­ken down into “con­tract” and “pre­sen­ta­tion” lay­ers. Some exam­ple of the con­tract side of the busi­ness­es I men­tion above (using stock own­er­ship as an exam­ple):

  • Stock­pile con­tract defines that they buy/sell at the end of the day, has a small fee to buy/sell, sup­port frac­tion­al shares, rein­vest div­i­dends, and have a cer­tain lev­el of insur­ance on my hold­ings.
  • Robin­hood’s con­tract is dif­fer­ent than Stock­pile’s in that they can buy at mar­ket or via lim­it order, but there is no fee to buy/sell. Robin­hood does­n’t rein­vest div­i­dends or sup­port frac­tion­al shares.
  • UBS’s con­tract, among oth­er things, allows for rein­vest­ing but only sup­ports whole shares.

Today, I have to go to dif­fer­ent apps to take advan­tage of these con­tracts because they tie their “busi­ness” to their “pre­sen­ta­tion” (mobile app or web­site or branch).

I could have one “wal­let” that in effect becomes my cus­tom all-in-one bank if they sep­a­rate the busi­ness (or con­tract) from the pre­sen­ta­tion of the busi­ness. I could pull the invest­ing fea­tures of Stock­pile, the advi­so­ry ser­vices of UBS, the tra­di­tion­al retail bank­ing accounts from Chase, and more into a sin­gle wal­let. A sin­gle pre­sen­ta­tion of my finan­cial pic­ture would have both obvi­ous val­ue and spur inno­va­tion unlike any­thing we’ve seen in finan­cial ser­vices because we’re not just shar­ing data (like TIBCO/MarketSheet) but also the terms of the busi­ness (the con­tract).

Fin­Tech would be com­pet­ing on the terms of the (blockchain) con­tract, con­tracts that are unbun­dled from the pre­sen­ta­tion of the finan­cial ser­vices busi­ness. Cryp­to Wal­lets are so cool because they’re the expe­ri­ence-man­i­fes­ta­tion of… Click To Tweet

The wal­let becomes the bank.

This makes for a real­ly inter­est­ing future for finan­cial ser­vices (and of course, well beyond finan­cial ser­vices).

Summary

Here’s where I remind you to share this post if you found it inter­est­ing. Please?

Let me help:

.@djbressler has writ­ten an easy-to-read post about why #Cryp­to Wal­lets are the banks of the future. I found it inter­est­ing and thought you might too. #Blockchain Click To Tweet

If you’ve read this far, have a look at Balance.io. They are doing amaz­ing work. More impor­tant­ly, they’re doing good work for the cryp­to ecosys­tem. Their CEO, Ric Bur­ton, is equal parts smart, nice, and inter­est­ing. The Bal­ance wal­let is gor­geous and plays at the lead­ing edge of all of this stuff. They’re also dri­ving the ecosys­tem for­ward around enabling wal­lets to reach their full poten­tial. Dis­clo­sure, I’m a small investor in Bal­ance (and no, they did­n’t issue a token).

If you are hold­ing cryp­to for the long term, you should check out Cel­sius or some­thing sim­i­lar and earn inter­est while you hold (no, I don’t care for ‘hodl”… it mess­es up my spell-check and gets auto­cor­rect­ed on mobile). Their CEO, who I have not met, is the real deal. He was also on Pom­p’s Off the Chain pod­cast talk­ing about Cel­sius. I do know one of their advi­sors, but my sug­ges­tion to check them out is based only on my expe­ri­ence as a user/customer of Cel­sius.

If you liked this post, you might be inter­est­ed in my thought­ful but brief def­i­n­i­tion of Dig­i­tal Trans­for­ma­tion (which I believe is relat­ed to the trans­for­ma­tion that cryp­to brings to finan­cial ser­vices). I have used this def­i­n­i­tion of Dig­i­tal Trans­for­ma­tion in speak­ing engage­ments through­out the Amer­i­c­as with great results — results that enable real­ly good con­ver­sa­tions about what dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion means for ‘the busi­ness’ and the bar­ri­ers that pre­vent suc­cess­ful trans­for­ma­tions, instead of just talk­ing about tech­nol­o­gy. I’m avail­able to help you make the impact of your com­plex tech­nolo­gies under­stand­able by humans.

Additional Reading

The Philip­pines has a Nation­al Retail Pay­ment Sys­tem frame­work that is work­ing towards my ideas above. Pearl Pay has a white label e‑wallet frame­work that banks can use to jump start their own work. I’m not famil­iar with their work, but I find it inter­est­ing that the arti­cle keeps talk­ing a about a “mis­sion” of bring­ing bank­ing capa­bil­i­ties to rur­al areas. A lot of cryp­to is break­ing down bar­ri­ers to enable ser­vice acces­si­bil­i­ty.

Related

Filed Under: Technology

David

If you like this post, you'll absolutely LOVE my book: 'The Elephant in the Room has a Paycheck: a fun & socially conscious blueprint to help the 99% get started investing'.

It's a quick read, and, if you can believe it considering that it's a book on investing, fun.

If you're looking for a simple and successful investing strategy, one that's purposely designed to keep you motivated, The Elephant's Paycheck is for you. And if you're already an accomplished investor, this book is likely for your spouse or your children so that they can become interested in what you're doing with the family's wealth.

Footer

Subscribe to stay in touch

If you enjoy the content I create, or the insights I share, please let me email you what I think will help you do better work.

If you don't double-opt-in by confirming your subscription, you won't be subscribed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Copyright © 2022 · Genesis Theme Framework · WPEngine Hosting